From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:45:38 +0200 Message-ID: <8360xs5wsd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mvr9wxqz.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87io1xwq1e.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87vb5wvzfz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87io1wt4cc.fsf@wanadoo.es> <8737syoima.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871t8iu277.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83d1s28kvh.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3gis7sm.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83twle71xy.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9hcr2g3.fsf@mbork.pl> <838u2o5zcv.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1s0r0p4.fsf@mbork.pl> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455385555 3280 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 17:45:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 18:45:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeGS-0004yO-FD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:45:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43748 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeGR-0001g4-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:45:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeGM-0001fv-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:45:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeGI-0003WC-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeGI-0003W8-B7; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:45:38 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1356 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeGH-0006a4-FI; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:45:38 -0500 In-reply-to: <87d1s0r0p4.fsf@mbork.pl> (message from Marcin Borkowski on Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:15:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199890 Archived-At: > From: Marcin Borkowski > Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:15:35 +0100 > > >> What about, say "a" and "а"? ;-) > > > > They don't look identical, and in any case, it should be clear they > > should never match, except when specifically searching for so-called > > "confusables". > > Well, they look *exactly* identical on my Emacs. I even C-x C-='d a few > times - still no difference. And there are more pairs like this. > > All this means it is way more complex than most people imagine. Of course it is. But the important thing is Emacs does TRT with this (and other) aspects of this complexity.