From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23205: 25.0.92; sort-tests is flaky Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 05:33:16 +0300 Message-ID: <8360vyp0gj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a8larb8d.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459737262 14633 80.91.229.3 (4 Apr 2016 02:34:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 02:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23205@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 04:34:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1amuLC-0004de-Lx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amuL8-0005z3-HV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amuL5-0005yt-4k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amuL4-00038J-Dp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amuL4-00038F-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1amuL4-0000vJ-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 02:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23205 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23205-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23205.14597372353536 (code B ref 23205); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 02:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2016 02:33:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1amuKx-0000uy-BB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41239) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1amuKv-0000ul-Sb for 23205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amuKl-00037T-Ks for 23205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amuKl-00037P-HS; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4548 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1amuKk-00014a-Ls; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:33:43 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Sun, 03 Apr 2016 21:00:50 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116000 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 21:00:50 +0000 > Cc: 23205@debbugs.gnu.org > > Do you sometimes see such failures if you just run the test once? > > I don't know, what's the difference between running it once and running it 1000 times? Since it fails randomly, > it could fail in any iteration, including the first one. You assume that it fails randomly. I would like to know if that is true. It could be that the failures only happen if the test is run repeatedly, couldn't it?