From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Change a while loop into do while Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:59:53 +0200 Message-ID: <8360lzhl12.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lgv2km1x.fsf@gmail.com> <83shp4gx9g.fsf@gnu.org> <83inq0geqy.fsf@gnu.org> <5688eb2c-1d04-d5ad-2696-e01420e25e74@cs.ucla.edu> <838tqvhpqu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483218017 7181 195.159.176.226 (31 Dec 2016 21:00:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 21:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: czipperz@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 31 22:00:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cNQl7-0000XW-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:00:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNQl8-0008Hx-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNQl2-0008HT-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNQky-0000Kd-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNQky-0000KT-0b; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1733 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cNQkw-0003hN-1L; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:59:59 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:56:35 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211046 Archived-At: > Cc: czipperz@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:56:35 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> It's not the usual GNU style. > > Maybe so, but it's widespread enough in Emacs sources, including > > outside of any macros, so it's a de-facto standard here. > > No, the de facto standard even in Emacs sources is the usual GNU style. Outside > of macro statements I count 142 instances of the usual GNU style, as opposed to > only 28 instances of the K&R-ish style where "do {" is on the same line. 28 instances are more than enough for me.