From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Region argument Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:19:37 +0200 Message-ID: <8360lweyt2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vau3jl6f.fsf@gmail.com> <8337h6vhr7.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8b8f0wp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483471716 17295 195.159.176.226 (3 Jan 2017 19:28:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 03 20:28:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOUky-0002zg-68 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:28:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35779 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOUl2-0004LV-85 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:28:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOUcb-0005KT-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:19:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOUcX-00087z-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:19:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOUcX-00087t-QE; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:19:41 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2224 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cOUcV-0002wJ-V5; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:19:41 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 03 Jan 2017 13:59:46 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211092 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 13:59:46 -0500 > > > We could start by having Someoneā„¢ "in the know" (hint, hint) describe > > the new conventions in the ELisp manual. > > I remember we discussed a new convention, but I'm not sure if we did end > up implementing one. Then what exactly are we talking about here? If a new convention doesn't exist, we obviously cannot change the existing convention to a new one, can we?