From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24837: bug#21609: bug#24837: 26.0.50; term.el: In char mode, displayed and executed commands can differ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:35:33 +0300 Message-ID: <8360bnqiy2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <08c3b161-174d-1fb7-5df4-bbf7f7d47ee9@orcon.net.nz> <83val1xk58.fsf@gnu.org> <1f3ce5dd-e8b0-6aee-1614-bbe0200baa95@orcon.net.nz> <83y3ox99yb.fsf@gnu.org> <33aed754-b4cf-a75d-837d-14ee596613b1@orcon.net.nz> <83r2ucqqu6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507639053 9997 195.159.176.226 (10 Oct 2017 12:37:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 24837@debbugs.gnu.org, 21609@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+psainty=orcon.net.nz@gnu.org To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 10 14:37:25 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tmf-0000j9-L4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:37:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tmm-0004kN-V2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tmW-0004fH-GY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tmQ-0002A1-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tmQ-00029j-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tmQ-0000KU-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24837.15076389821195 (code B ref 24837); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2017 12:36:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tlm-0000JC-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:36:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tlk-0000J0-Jy for 24837@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:36:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tlZ-0001mL-Oh for 24837@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:36:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tlF-0000rr-0q; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2086 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e1tlE-0002KN-Bf; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:35:48 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Phil Sainty on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:11:17 +1300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138176 Archived-At: > Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 24837@debbugs.gnu.org, 21609@debbugs.gnu.org, > bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+psainty=orcon.net.nz@gnu.org > From: Phil Sainty > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:11:17 +1300 > > On 10/10/17 04:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> +*** New user options `term-char-mode-buffer-read-only' and > >> +`term-char-mode-point-at-process-mark' > > > I have a difficulty understanding why the user would like to change > > the values of these options from their defaults. How about revising > > this text to describe (a) the default behavior, and (b) when would > > someone want to change that by tweaking these options? > > I'm likewise not sure whether users will *actually* want to do this. In that case, the text should say something like Customize these options to nil if you want the previous behavior. > In any case I'll see if I can improve the wording... Thanks.