From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#27445: 26.0.50; Insufficient documentation for pinentry.el
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:41:41 +0200
Message-ID: <83609zadl6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87vano7ihu.fsf@drachen> <878tfy15lw.fsf@web.de>
	<83vaiz63f3.fsf@gnu.org> <83zi7jgbka.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h8tqg30t.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <vz1bmjwvnqv.fsf@gmail.com>
	<od13757vne6.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <83eford3rw.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87ine35roo.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <83po8ab9jk.fsf@gnu.org>
	<od1h8tmp9rk.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87zi7d7qhx.fsf@web.de>
	<87lgixvayl.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87y3mww419.fsf@web.de>
	<od1bmjsx87u.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <83efonaj7y.fsf@gnu.org>
	<od1tvxjwwdu.fsf-ueno@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511538192 1947 195.159.176.226 (24 Nov 2017 15:43:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:43:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 27445@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Daiki Ueno <ueno@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 24 16:43:08 2017
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1eIG8A-00004x-7W
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:43:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49893 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1eIG8H-0007Uj-Ku
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:43:13 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50949)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eIG8B-0007UN-Gt
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:43:08 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eIG85-0007Nh-Vx
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:43:07 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47439)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eIG85-0007NP-Ro
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:43:01 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eIG85-0002FS-KD
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:43:01 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:43:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27445.B27445.15115381448597@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27445
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
Original-Received: via spool by 27445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27445.15115381448597
	(code B ref 27445); Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:43:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 27445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2017 15:42:24 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eIG7U-0002Eb-1V
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:42:24 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59870)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1eIG7S-0002EP-Of
	for 27445@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:42:23 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1eIG7M-0006uN-Or
	for 27445@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:42:17 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32927)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1eIG7G-0006oo-2h; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:42:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3106 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1eIG7E-0007PP-5f; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:42:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <od1tvxjwwdu.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> (message from Daiki Ueno on Fri,
	24 Nov 2017 16:04:45 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140311
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/140311>

> From: Daiki Ueno <ueno@gnu.org>
> Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de,  27445@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:04:45 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Please don't use such language here, certainly not when replying to
> > legitimate bug reports.
> 
> Legitimate bug reports should report the root problem to the relevant
> project (GnuPG or Debian), instead of insisting on documenting a broken
> behavior inherently caused by an external factor.

Feel free to point that out, but without insulting the people who
report problems here.  We don't want to discourage users from
reporting issues because they are afraid of being publicly humiliated.