From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: profiler-report seems to be missing data? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:19:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83600aiec6.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534429924 16922 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2018 14:32:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:32:04 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 16:32:00 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqJJd-0004F7-FX for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:31:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqJLk-0001c4-4M for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqJ7h-0002YJ-Hp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqJ7d-0000Xv-Gu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:19:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqJ7d-0000Xr-DL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2155 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fqJ7c-0001uq-Fs for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:19:32 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Charlie Andrews on Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:47:30 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:117671 Archived-At: > From: Charlie Andrews > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:47:30 -0400 > > (I apologize if this messes up the threading - I saw Eli's response > > on lists.gnu.org, but the mail didn't show up in my Gmail inbox. I'm > replying to it here.) > > The version of the package that I'm profiling is unfortunately not byte > compiled. I did this by running M-x locate-library find-things-fast > , which returned "~/github/find-things-fast/find-things-fast.el". > This is my local development version of the library, not the ELPA version > of the library which also includes the byte-compiled version. In that case, perhaps the bindings done by let* take a lot of time because these are variables that become local when set, and you have many buffers in your session? Do you see any changes in the profile if you run the code in a fresh session? Btw, the profile says that quite a lot of time is spent in these functions: > > - ftf-find-file 1597 > > 80% > > - ftf-project-files-alist 1522 > > 76% > > - ftf-project-files-hash 1330 > > 66% > > - let 1330 > > 66% > > - mapcar 1330 > > 66% > > - # 1024 > > 51% So I'd suggest to look at them as well.