From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Submitting patches: need I do more than send them to the bug tracker? Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 17:43:22 +0200 Message-ID: <835zxmm605.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540741308 22488 195.159.176.226 (28 Oct 2018 15:41:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 15:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: slippycheeze@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 28 16:41:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gGnC9-0005kn-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 16:41:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40520 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGnEF-0007T8-Ep for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGnE5-0007Sl-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:43:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGnDs-0000s8-CT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGnDi-0000oj-1U; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3142 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gGnDf-0008C8-BU; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:43:17 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:24:18 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230752 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 18:24:18 -0400 > Cc: Emacs developers > > If you don't get a response to a patch, sending a short message to > make sure it hasn't gotten lost like you've done is the right thing to > do. I would generally say to wait a full week. Yes, a good advice. I usually wait for comments for at least a week, if I have no comments myself.