From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: sendmail-program with msmtpq Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:44:05 +0200 Message-ID: <835zx29u7u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837ehj9d4f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542037356 30817 195.159.176.226 (12 Nov 2018 15:42:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:42:36 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 12 16:42:32 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMEMC-0007ti-3Q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:42:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49283 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMEOI-00081M-C2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMENr-00080w-Ny for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMENo-00082S-Ak for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMENo-00082H-6i for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:44:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1951 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gMENn-0006vv-Nd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:44:12 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Xavier Maillard on Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:22:54 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:118654 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:22:54 +0100 > From: Xavier Maillard > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > in fact, no matter my online status, calling `compose-mail' after a > previous call to `sendmail-send-it' behaves the same. > > I did not pay attention before but, I have many `sendmail-errors-XXXX' > buffers with msmtpqs's output (exactly the same output than when > calling it from the terminal). Please show the full message you get in the *Messages* buffer after a failure to send a message. > Is it safe to "silent" msmtpq via an advice in the `sendmail-send-it' > function ? Sorry, I don't understand what that means, nor how it is related to the issue at hand. What do you mean by "silent"? if you mean "silence", I still don't see where did you silence it and why do you think it might be unsafe to do that.