From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34849: Compilation issues with g++ on some files Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:53:16 +0200 Message-ID: <835zset4tf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736nqzdfe.fsf@gmail.com> <874l82krcs.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7hsm9zj.fsf@gmail.com> <838sxbuxn5.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="10185"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 34849@debbugs.gnu.org, agrambot@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 20 08:01:41 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h6VEK-0002UF-3Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43820 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6VEI-0000zg-Q4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6VE7-0000o1-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:01:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6w-0004u3-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6w-0004te-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6w-0005Kx-AZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34849 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 34849-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34849.155306481720477 (code B ref 34849); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 06:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34849) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2019 06:53:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6W-0005KD-RA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6V-0005K0-Bk for 34849@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6P-0003vs-7Y; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:53:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1787 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h6V6H-0003OQ-D3; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:53:21 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:31:46 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156535 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 34849@debbugs.gnu.org, agrambot@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:31:46 -0400 > > > My POV on this is that we should make Emacs buildable with as many > > modern GUI toolkits as practically possible/reasonable, because it is > > not clear which one(s) of them will remain workable and maintained in > > the long run. > > That argument could be valid for toolkits that we could possibly use > in the long run. Because of the possible future licensing conflict, > we cannot consider Qt as an option for the long run unless we convince > the Qt developers to change to GPL 3-or-later. But there's no conflict yet, is there? Also, if Qt is installed on many systems as a system library, we could use it as a system component, couldn't we?