From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A target that's even more bootstrap? Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:06:47 +0300 Message-ID: <835zp0quc8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837e9iubyp.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0japujz.fsf@telefonica.net> <87v9x1oib6.fsf@telefonica.net> <831rzpsi5f.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9x1r2y5.fsf@gnu.org> <83imt1qzhr.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef3pqvzs.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="139487"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 15:27:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdx5k-000a8Y-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdx5j-00020t-IW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdwxe-0003Tf-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:18:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdwmK-0001AE-2u; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2524 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hdwmI-0005E8-Im; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:06:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:32:28 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237963 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:32:28 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > With the patch below, the only remaining files (not in a clean > check-out) are: > > +./info > +./src/config.in > +./lib/sys > +./configure > > Should the ./configure file also be deleted by extraclean? Yes, I think so. > If I remove src/config.in, then the subsequent "make" after "make > extraclean" fails with > > config.status: error: cannot find input file: `src/config.in' > GNUmakefile:72: recipe for target 'Makefile' failed > > and I have to run autogen.sh again... How is this different from doing the same in a fresh checkout? is this because the configure script wasn't removed, or for some other reason? > The two directories > > +./info > +./lib/sys > > perhaps don't matter, and I'd rather not do an rm -rf on a directory... Are these directories empty?