From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 6cd5678: Clarify compiler-pacifier in frame.c Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:33:41 +0300 Message-ID: <835zmjg1re.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835zmnjdjm.fsf@gnu.org> <227db16b-17d1-b44b-97b3-e80211415eef@cs.ucla.edu> <831rx9iupo.fsf@gnu.org> <32f9db09-0c04-df03-4bb7-76fe2aa9a88f@cs.ucla.edu> <83tva4fjkz.fsf@gnu.org> <87cb5a0c-bdd8-726c-80ed-92e9f3518a58@cs.ucla.edu> <83o90cfecf.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfvg3qbi.fsf@telefonica.net> <83imqjgb1g.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftln4wm0.fsf@telefonica.net> <83a7bvg4a2.fsf@gnu.org> <87blwb4u2i.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="5853"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 26 21:36:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i2Kmb-0001Nn-1L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:36:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2KmZ-0003if-EH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2KkL-00026v-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2KkK-0006SF-Sc; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3939 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i2KkH-0000T0-Jt; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:33:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <87blwb4u2i.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes on Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:15:17 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239588 Archived-At: > From: Óscar Fuentes > Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:15:17 +0200 > > > The initialization in this case was added because GCC flagged a > > potential use-before-define. After that, there's no more bug for > > Valgrind to find, so I see no reason to leave UNINIT around. > > Let's suppose that the warning was correct and the hacker was wrong when > judged it bogus. The warning was correct, and I didn't decide it was bogus. I added the initialization because the warning was NOT bogus. Please see the code and the comment.