From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:58:00 +0200 Message-ID: <835z35nf3r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> <838s83ra3q.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwjocn7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8gzpj31.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wnvmlwjq.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0rmkh68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z35frk0.fsf@gnus.org> <87blcx2drf.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, juri@linkov.net To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 20:59:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TjS-0000pT-Tx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 20:59:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41654 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TjR-00070A-Ui for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:59:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TiQ-0006Yq-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:57:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TiP-0008LY-EU; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3986 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l8TiM-00071A-V6; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:57:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87blcx2drf.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> (message from Sean Whitton on Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:32:36 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264081 Archived-At: > From: Sean Whitton > Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:32:36 -0700 > Cc: Gregory Heytings , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I'm sorry for more bikeshedding, but may I suggest using C-x c instead > of C-x x? > > I just spent some time trying to repeatedly type C-x x followed by some > letter and I found that I kept typing C-x C-x by mistake. What will happen if you by mistake type "C-x C-c"?