From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49074: Emacs website does not display Lao string correctly Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:28:49 +0300 Message-ID: <835yybznxa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o8c4zbph.fsf@gnu.org> <4791fa30-be3e-d97e-48f0-e9961ff2cdb8@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3031"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49074@debbugs.gnu.org To: Vee Satayamas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 08:29:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lu80A-0000cC-SY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:29:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu808-000576-Rr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:29:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7zy-00056y-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7zy-00026x-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7zx-0005Hw-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49074 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49074-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49074.162399772920306 (code B ref 49074); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49074) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2021 06:28:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7zl-0005HS-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7zk-0005HE-1s for 49074@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7ze-0001rF-RQ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2599 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu7ze-0002N4-DV; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 02:28:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4791fa30-be3e-d97e-48f0-e9961ff2cdb8@gmail.com> (message from Vee Satayamas on Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:39:38 +0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208686 Archived-At: > Cc: 49074@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Vee Satayamas > Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:39:38 +0700 > > > This is an image from an old version of Emacs. The current versions > > don't have this problem anymore. > You are right. It works on my computer. I request to update the website. > Should I report this to a different mailing list? No, this list is fine. We just need to wait for someone to produce a fixed image; I cannot do that myself.