From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64101: 29.0.91; Eglot inlay hints rendered out of order Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:17:21 +0300 Message-ID: <835y7mqlcu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r0qar07l.fsf@gnu.org> <877cs28m23.fsf@gmail.com> <83edmaqskn.fsf@gnu.org> <87352q8ent.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kklimonda@syntaxhighlighted.com, 64101@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 17 15:18:20 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVop-00013Q-U1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 15:18:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVoa-0005LT-UH; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVoZ-0005KQ-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVoY-0001ns-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVoY-0002eL-Ex for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 13:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64101 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64101-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64101.168700785310150 (code B ref 64101); Sat, 17 Jun 2023 13:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64101) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2023 13:17:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVo4-0002dc-UX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVnz-0002dN-HS for 64101@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVnt-0001lL-UG; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:17:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=GeMuZi3YC4zcW4ZYThfwzxiA5odWLSSvoUKcTiTHu7U=; b=PVc0vr7o/LmNNUiGOGu1 UOKTUfZvrVr02HlkU2a7qb+lu0nZzsLVonocgh0owE9HplZixqzCHCuHQ7uLVcuplYI/TtQ0ZKh0X D2upteBq9KyHwkHu3AOgGE/xTXCiaW/+eA1kJkIUIJarGr8fb/ebZ4FpbGCnd15Nrq/JBu2bIFMNw YBPuZPe4B4QQS8KQThk8SHiUcd+vnhCfAHkHbdH6P2BUYOPYljh4vZFdHsbKAq/26KEBQ7GZ2k9z9 iKUuPTGv+eIncbP4f3Y2VokiPRYW5WE8ew1o8D3sLHQ539rMuDaRYQu27zknJTHgUdhd2+YVInW+a oKps0Xe1gTRhvg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAVnt-0003qy-J1; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 09:17:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87352q8ent.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= on Sat, 17 Jun 2023 13:19:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:263536 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Cc: kklimonda@syntaxhighlighted.com, 64101@debbugs.gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 13:19:18 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Emacs 29 comes with a completely different implementation of overlays > > than previous versions. > > > > I don't think this is specific to macOS, but perhaps the order in > > which overlays are arranged is arbitrary to some extent, in which case > > different systems can have different orders. > > I would find this "undefined order" strange, and perhaps a bug in > itself. Maybe whoever rewrote the overlay code (Stefan?) could chime > in. It wasn't Stefan, he just merged the branch to master and fixed bugs. But why do you say this is a bug? Does any documentation promise any particular order of overlays? > In any case, one defensive option is to push the patch I showed to Emacs > 29. Subject, of course, to testing on at least some machine where the > problem does indeed happen. Yes, let's wait for the confirmation that it fixes the problem. Thanks.