From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Brand new clojure support in Emacs ;-)
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:44:48 +0300
Message-ID: <835y4ucrz3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87a5uw9ivs.fsf@posteo.net>
 <87ttt42gna.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmy080kn.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83v8djcydl.fsf@gnu.org> <87350ndquw.fsf@dfreeman.email>
 <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email>
 <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email>
 <87zg2hsyrd.fsf@dfreeman.email> <E1qZLM2-0003BN-0h@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <87h6ontwfv.fsf@posteo.net>
 <CALDnm52CXJ5MJG-Vm7ZsH=33SRJ2fyNkXkJkEnRAzYmuTyu78A@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1qbsli-0006pf-LH@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <e14defdd-326e-d32a-342b-cb4ae1da0b8f@gutov.dev>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="36501"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rms@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 08:45:55 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1qbxuk-0009Ia-Ua
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 08:45:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1qbxuT-0007M2-L7; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 02:45:37 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1qbxuP-0007Kh-22
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 02:45:34 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1qbxuO-00063F-Nw; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 02:45:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=3OGrR31lchA41N78INwepEaPgGMJd72p3OI+teiH+tY=; b=AGM9JVy0rY98
 XpQTqsNeVYXIXBnWX/2FIoZoRobdhXA3ZFjgIzWbQFDx01+K2ORmELetneRXxI5NzrooE96CUeoVu
 IBVyVxJ2O/3lsdDXOf2VtiRz8mN4cFGFKx6J+Rhd1aSzfdJdcH8CSEqAitylaS15QlIRwqNDoYuIB
 I3dzc6Ishl15uA20SanjeNZBWNtq7cVn8lR4YDOZEgVn36MlkBo97iHFlCT16PT0C5jhpijiIrKMf
 YLbWhXkmNw6tLcVVzRy/1IfR74pTXiWQnRpYi2ahO4bClnkDbWb65S+QhEYDt9rsbKG55ZIuFZT78
 6z8Bk0WOlB2+7dfZMij8mw==;
In-Reply-To: <e14defdd-326e-d32a-342b-cb4ae1da0b8f@gutov.dev> (message from
 Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 1 Sep 2023 04:34:46 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309724
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/309724>

> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 04:34:46 +0300
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
> 
> On 01/09/2023 04:16, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > They don't
> > think in terms of what is best for Emacs
> 
> What if they do?

If they did, they would have agreed with us, or at least said they'd
like to.