From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:14:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <835c85d1-29bd-4397-8344-a9ec30cb2df6@default> References: <55A74B3C.8030608@gmail.com> <83r3dln1ez.fsf@gnu.org> <87y47tzn0v.fsf@mbork.pl> <83lh3tmyzv.fsf@gnu.org> <87twihzhni.fsf@mbork.pl> <83fuu1mu25.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg9jynn0.fsf@mbork.pl> <83h9edkhjs.fsf@gnu.org> <874mabe5h6.fsf@mbork.pl> <83twibfil2.fsf@gnu.org> <87y47mcywp.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bmyrvzh1.fsf@mbork.pl> <878ttux198.fsf@mbork.pl> <366cfd22-c35c-4980-bc81-7f6df6c180a0@default> <87shra8hnz.fsf@mbork.pl> <87k2cj8z3w.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpfppe09.fsf@mbork.pl> <42ff21f5-3df8-4935-b30d-b13b6bcd5f85@default> <8737fqtt8k.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486484912 3528 195.159.176.226 (7 Feb 2017 16:28:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rfflrccrd@gmail.com, 21072@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 17:28:27 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8d0-0000i0-Vn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:28:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55219 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8d6-0002Wp-O6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8R6-0001Do-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8R0-0000qh-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:16:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Qz-0000qZ-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:16:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Qz-00035P-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21072-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21072.148648410911801 (code B ref 21072); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2017 16:15:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Q9-00034H-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:51548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cb8Q7-000343-NT for 21072@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id v17GF1Bf002643 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:15:02 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v17GF1aP005838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:15:01 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0007.oracle.com (abhmp0007.oracle.com [141.146.116.13]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v17GEw6U004599; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:15:00 GMT In-Reply-To: <8737fqtt8k.fsf@mbork.pl> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 12.0.6753.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129079 Archived-At: > >> ;; Trick with 'mark-defun-back due to Drew Adams > > > > No need for the attribution. ;-) >=20 > Why not;-)? I'll change it to a link to your message, however - this > might be actually more useful for future developers. Yes, that's more useful; thx. > > I didn't really test, but for this: > > > > (defun a () > > nil) > > (defun b () > > nil) > > ;;;; > > (defun c () > > nil) > > > > With point anywhere in either of the last two defuns or > > on the comment line between them, `M-- C-M-h' selects not > > only the expected defun but also the last line of the > > defun before it. > > > > E.g., with point at the beginning of the comment line, > > this is selected: > > > > nil) > > (defun a () > > nil) >=20 > Yep, you're right. However, this seems to be a strange feature of > beginning-of-defun. Place the point at the very same place at say M-: > (beginning-of-defun 0). See? >=20 > Since I guess almost nobody follows this discussion anymore, I'll ask > about it in a separate thread on emacs-devel. The question remains, > however: should I "fix" beginning-of-defun or just circumvent this > behavior in my code? Yes, please pose the question for emacs-devel. And thanks for working on this bug.