From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:39:49 +0200 Message-ID: <834obfd9iy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bp5te3s8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290023069 23285 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2010 19:44:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:44:29 +0000 (UTC) To: handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 20:44:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PInvc-0005eu-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:44:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIntp-0001rQ-Hz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:42:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53175 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIntU-0001h2-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIntO-0006Zk-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:42:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIntO-0006Y4-6Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LC100E00NVZP300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:41:52 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.249.126]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LC100D0FO1PNTB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:41:51 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132790 Archived-At: > From: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:26:15 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > By the way, one other issue is that display tables take precedence > over glyphless-char-display, in the sense that characters for which > there are non-trivial entries in the current display table are > displayed using the display table, disregarding any > glyphless-char-display-control settings. If this is what we want, we > should probably document that. And another issue: the character group c0-control includes the newline. So if the display of this group is set to anything at all, the newlines are not displayed as such. I doubt that users would expect or want that when they customize the display of c0-control. So maybe we should exempt newline (and perhaps also TAB) from this group; users who really want that can always set glyphless-char-display directly. WDYT?