From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windows build failure Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 23:28:50 +0300 Message-ID: <834ndl5y4d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ppwcpegh.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjveorcj.fsf@gnu.org> <86zjveudtd.fsf@gmail.com> <83obbt6cbw.fsf@gnu.org> <51A634B0.8070607@cs.ucla.edu> <83ehcp66tz.fsf@gnu.org> <51A64F1E.9080800@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369859331 1401 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2013 20:28:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 20:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 29 22:28:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UhmzJ-0005Hf-Qa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 22:28:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhmzJ-0001hQ-CB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhmzC-0001hJ-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhmz7-0006jR-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:34667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhmz7-0006jD-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:28:37 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MNK00J00U6SGK00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 23:28:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MNK00JUDU7N6EC0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 29 May 2013 23:28:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <51A64F1E.9080800@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159903 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:55:26 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 05/29/13 10:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > the configure script puts -std=gnu99 on the GCC > > command line, which should fix this, right? > > Yes, that's the idea. Possibly the appropriate > 'make' variable is not being used in a makefile.in > somewhere, though; that might explain the problem. > Or perhaps someone is invoking 'make' by hand and > is overriding CC or CFLAGS, and is forgetting to > include -std=gnu99 in the right spot. If we do this somewhere (e.g., in nt/config.nt): #define restrict __restrict would this solve the problem even when -std=gnu99 is not in use?