From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15288: 24.3.50; Speedbar makes minibuffer lost focus when code is compiled Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:37:37 +0300 Message-ID: <834n9ym5pa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871u522jnn.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378474707 11397 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2013 13:38:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15288@debbugs.gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 06 15:38:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEu-0001T0-6h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:38:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEt-0000Xv-PW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEk-0000Wi-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:38:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEd-00057M-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEd-00057I-84 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEc-0005pr-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15288 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15288.137847467622417 (code B ref 15288); Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2013 13:37:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43676 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwEV-0005pT-7f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:37:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:64918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHwES-0005pC-66 for 15288@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MSP00000HOXJM00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15288@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:37:45 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MSP0007GHUXAH40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:37:45 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <871u522jnn.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78050 Archived-At: > From: Thierry Volpiatto > Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:56:28 +0200 > > If you remove all *.elc files and restart Emacs, it is no more reproductible. The long discussion in the issue tracker seems to suggest that byte-compiling *.el files on Windows has something to do with this. Did anyone try copying *.elc files compiled on Unix to Windows, and re-running the test case? Or just comparing the *.elc files compiled on Unix and on Windows? I actually can hardly believe that some problem that is only revealed in byte-compiled code could be Windows specific. There's nothing in the byte-code interpreter that is specific to Windows, AFAIK.