From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19865: tar-untar-buffer: should honor default-directory Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:16:03 +0200 Message-ID: <834mqoy9h8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a90gd91b.fsf@violet.siamics.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423916243 27646 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2015 12:17:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19865@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Shmakov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 14 13:17:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbeq-0007xx-8A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:17:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59548 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbep-0003bD-Ge for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:17:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbem-0003ai-EH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbeg-0004DR-RG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbeg-0004DK-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbeg-0004K3-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19865.142391617116548 (code B ref 19865); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2015 12:16:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbdq-0004Iq-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:46327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMbdp-0004Ic-4H for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJR00O00GBW5000@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:14:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJR00NBJGNYV410@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:14:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87a90gd91b.fsf@violet.siamics.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99373 Archived-At: > From: Ivan Shmakov > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:31:12 +0000 > > As currently implemented (tested on 7eb2077f9dd1, 2015-02-06 > 15:01:12 UTC), tar-untar-buffer uses the default-directory value > for the “data” buffer (see tar-data-buffer), instead of the > (arguably much less obscure) one for the tar-mode buffer itself > (which could easily be changed by the user via M-x cd.) Sorry, I don't understand the implications of the change, or even the problem. Could you elaborate? The doc string of tar-untar-buffer says: "Extract all archive members in the tar-file into the current directory." which seems to match what it does. Why isn't default-directory of tar-data-buffer the right choice for doing that?