From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:49:29 +0300 Message-ID: <834mn339p2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5t6gex.fsf@gnu.org> <555E09AE.9070208@cs.ucla.edu> <83lhgh6fb2.fsf@gnu.org> <555E2C10.4010501@cs.ucla.edu> <83h9r5670s.fsf@gnu.org> <555E6A15.8010404@cs.ucla.edu> <831ti957wp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5s4uml.fsf@gnu.org> <555F740D.4030304@cs.ucla.edu> <837fs04egz.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalco1mg.fsf@igel.home> <83y4kg2yjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq002yct.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6oo0h3.fsf@igel.home> <83vbfk2x9l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnhcnym6.fsf@igel.home> <83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> <838ucf3dh8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432374593 30405 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 09:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 09:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 11:49:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw63p-0000Er-Ki for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 11:49:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37212 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw63p-00028Y-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41543) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw63i-00028S-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:49:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw63f-0008S9-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:49:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:64397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw63e-0008RA-QC; Sat, 23 May 2015 05:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NOS00100R799Z00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 May 2015 12:49:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NOS0007QRAGT770@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 May 2015 12:49:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186758 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 11:41:45 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The issue is their accuracy, not their existence or being byte > > offsets. > > Byte offsets are always accurate. Not if they are supposed to be byte counts in an Emacs buffer.