From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts? Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 09:05:28 +0300 Message-ID: <834mi526l3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151002.073900.472512461.wl@gnu.org> <83pp0x7mnq.fsf@gnu.org> <20151004.063952.389316157.wl@gnu.org> <83zizz1590.fsf@gnu.org> <838u7i1kpn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444025167 9509 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 06:06:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 08:05:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiyuD-0006vV-Qi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 08:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiyuD-0005Hv-7E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ziyu0-0005Hl-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ziytv-0000QR-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ziytu-0000QL-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVQ00B00GKOA000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 09:05:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVQ00B36GX57N50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 09:05:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190919 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:43:12 -0700 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > One of the things that always bothered me are the composition rules for > > Arabic and Persian (see the end of lisp/language/misc-lang.el). Perhaps you > > could take a look at them, in particular the ZWJ and ZWNJ related rules, and > > other similar stuff. I think someone said in the past we lack some rules > > there. > > Hmm, it looks fine here, but maybe I don't quite understand yet. Z and W are > always "final" letters, making the J stand separate in ZWJ. The connective > between N and J in ZWNJ looks as I'd expect. I meant ZWJ and ZWNJ the characters, U+200C and U+200D. Or did I misunderstand you?