From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Collation tests in fns-tests.el Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:07:27 +0200 Message-ID: <834mh7z9rk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5633AE31.2030501@cornell.edu> <83mvv0yucm.fsf@gnu.org> <5633DCD8.7060706@cornell.edu> <83bnbgyr87.fsf@gnu.org> <5633EC3D.4070903@cornell.edu> <87y4ejbexx.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446282484 5735 80.91.229.3 (31 Oct 2015 09:08:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kbrown@cornell.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 31 10:07:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsS8i-0003Z4-4r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:07:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsS8h-0007vX-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsS8e-0007vQ-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsS8Z-0001i4-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:47488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsS8Z-0001i0-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NX200D00UF5C400@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:06:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NX2006S0UN9OP60@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:06:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87y4ejbexx.fsf@gmx.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193008 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:49:30 +0100 > > Ken Brown writes: > > >> If Cygwin's implementation of strcoll cannot be fixed, then we should > >> treat this test on Cygwin as expected failure. > > > > I'll probably do that, but I'll wait to see if Michael has anything to add. > > I have no other idea, sorry. Let's mark the test case as expected to > fail for Cygwin. And maybe a note about this behaviour could be added in > doc/lispref/strings.texi. Well, one other idea is for Cygwin's Emacs build to have its private implementation of strcoll, similar to what w32_compare_strings does.