From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22068: 25.0.50; Delayed reaction to switching frames? Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:51:31 +0200 Message-ID: <834mg0ja8c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lh9et87o.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <565EAA66.70002@gmx.at> <87h9k1s0ng.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <565EC271.1030201@gmx.at> <83fuzlj6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <565F2DEA.4050906@gmx.at> <837fkwka4d.fsf@gnu.org> <565F3445.9080903@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449125602 22552 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2015 06:53:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22068@debbugs.gnu.org, dak@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 03 07:53:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NlO-0006G9-MO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 07:53:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NlN-0000tq-Tc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:53:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NlK-0000tZ-JC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:53:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NlG-0000U6-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NlG-0000U2-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NlF-0006PD-Vi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22068.144912553124565 (code B ref 22068); Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2015 06:52:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4NkQ-0006O9-IC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:52:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:49519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Nk6-0006NN-Ii for 22068@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYR00400S8WQT00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 22068@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:51:48 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYR004VISEBGZ60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:51:48 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <565F3445.9080903@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109541 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:11:17 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: dak@gnu.org, 22068@debbugs.gnu.org > > > When I call the function it does call, that call does not return if it > > gets switch-frame events. IOW, the function that asks the question > > doesn't know the frame was switched, and cannot do what David probably > > wants: switch frame and reissue the question. > > OK. But how can we get rid of that "switch-frame-" echo at least? Will this really solve some significant part of the problem? If it does, we could perhaps introduce some inhibit-SOMETHING variable to do that.