From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: <834mcafgco.fsf@gnu.org> References: <64a52598-ad53-498c-993c-67d7827dbdfc@default> <838u1uuuau.fsf@gnu.org> <878u1um2xl.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87fuw090k7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y49spuxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4achc.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <83r3fkpb3u.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5rps0t.fsf@gnu.org> <56E066BD.5050403@cs.ucla.edu> <83wpp9jt82.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov1dje9.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <83pouyfk6k.fsf@gnu.org> <9174d641-9f3f-6c03-2383-a4d5b7ac4f10@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457889451 5583 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2016 17:17:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, rms@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 18:17:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1af9ds-0004be-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:17:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9dr-0001N5-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9do-0001Mt-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9dl-0003Js-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:17:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9dl-0003JW-0w; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4562 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1af9dd-0007MT-55; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:17:09 -0400 In-reply-to: <9174d641-9f3f-6c03-2383-a4d5b7ac4f10@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:05:47 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201611 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:05:47 +0200 > > On 03/13/2016 05:53 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > As for the > > latter, I think quite a few people who track the development and > > contribute patches do that, so I think it's important for their > > workflows to be undisturbed. > > If a person can rebase, they can fix the commit message while doing > that. There's no point is supporting an alternative mechanism there. No, I mean the messages corrected in commits by others.