From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next Emacs RC tomorrow? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:52:47 +0300 Message-ID: <834m6she0w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bn12q8as.fsf@petton.fr> <135b23c3-305e-3b2b-4f09-9be29cab2ed2@yandex.ru> <83d1lghf5k.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470840978 5038 195.159.176.226 (10 Aug 2016 14:56:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 16:56:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUvV-0001C0-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:56:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42107 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUvS-0002W3-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUsV-0006cW-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUsQ-0006Ez-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUsQ-0006Eu-8G; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4050 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bXUsO-0002nM-7d; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:53:00 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:36:27 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206539 Archived-At: > Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:36:27 +0300 > > > Would it work to make the buffer unibyte _after_ inserting the URL? > > Does anyone of those who objected to making it unibyte to begin with > > object to this proposal? > > Which buffer do you mean? The one used by url-generic-parse-url. > Please take a look at my last two messages in that bug, by the way. Done.