From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:49:39 +0300 Message-ID: <834m43njzg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpgzo30m.fsf@gnu.org> <5a4bbe6d-08ce-e6c6-39d1-49c9cd6d1ffd@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhvns9a.fsf@gnu.org> <87r37784zm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477237865 27742 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2016 15:51:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 17:51:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byL2d-00033R-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:50:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41483 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byL2g-00048J-AE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:50:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byL1v-00048C-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:49:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byL1s-0007Fv-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byL1s-0007Fr-9W; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3173 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byL1r-0004Qc-Fz; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 11:49:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <87r37784zm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:37 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208626 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:22:37 +0200 > Cc: Paul Eggert , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Okt 23 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Is it reasonable to require a version of glibc that still supports > > __malloc_initialize_hook? When people upgrade to a newer glibc, the > > previous version is still left on the system, I presume (for programs > > that need them which were built against those old versions)? > > There will ever be only one glibc. Sorry, I don't understand what that means. Can't it be that some older program is linked against an older libc.so.N version?