From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:41:50 +0300 Message-ID: <834m425eb5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnm0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <83insi5jy9.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmya5i7q.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477298550 4938 195.159.176.226 (24 Oct 2016 08:42:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 10:42:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byapW-0006od-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:42:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45273 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byapZ-0004hx-0p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byapP-0004hI-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byapM-0007RA-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byapM-0007R5-4B; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:41:52 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1419 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byapL-0006XA-Bb; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:41:51 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:24:26 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208665 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:24:26 +0200 > > > We are not talking about 1 sec, we are talking about less than half > > that time, potentially even 1/4th of a second. > > That's still a lot. > > $ time emacs --batch --eval t > 0.027user 0.011system 0m0.048selapsed 79.66%CPU Then I guess you will have to continue using unexec, and when that alternative disappears, switch to some other editor.