From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 21:47:08 +0200 Message-ID: <834lzcok3n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> <831suipb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <58B5C4A1.6050601@gmx.at> <83shmyno97.fsf@gnu.org> <58B6866B.2040307@gmx.at> <83fuixnf7l.fsf@gnu.org> <58B722AA.4090501@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488397693 14850 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 19:48:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 20:48:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAEI-0003HH-Jn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:48:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAEO-0003kF-98 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAEI-0003k9-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAEE-0002uw-Cs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAEE-0002ug-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAEE-0000Ax-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.1488397665651 (code B ref 25851); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2017 19:47:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjADx-0000AR-Fy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:47:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjADv-0000AD-56 for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjADl-0002is-Lc for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:47:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjADl-0002id-IJ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:47:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1319 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cjADk-00028k-Cj; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:47:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <58B722AA.4090501@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:36:10 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130002 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:36:10 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If that's the reason, and we think doing that is legitimate, is there > > any other solution but to shut up the warning? > > I think that warning is legitimate. It's legitimate, but what we do as legitimate as well, right? And emitting a warning in such use cases will only annoy users, right?