From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#16828: 24.3.50;
	eval-expression, character representation of integer results
	time-consuming
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:51:42 +0300
Message-ID: <834lyg9b9t.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CABr8ebbLKP8As7ud-u3wmJ4cuua1NhKX8_yGpfSd7-1p1ez+bA@mail.gmail.com>
	<83mwhk4v48.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CABr8ebYbBF7AgHHsKWtyAi-c6BHvNpBis48+PgcfcZBH1Y-7OA@mail.gmail.com>
	<83txbr2sye.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjljf086.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box>
	<83a9di3lt1.fsf@gnu.org> <877g8mb3lh.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<b4my510yqdt.fsf@jpl.org> <530DBEEE.8060805@gmx.at>
	<87zig84s6l.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wpbc9ldc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAM-tV-_t2bjpE2byh3NvJjw8dfxTwk4rM7EjwSdTM13EgC=-wA@mail.gmail.com>
	<83lgrs9k8p.fsf@gnu.org> <87inmw3x5b.fsf@users.sourceforge.net>
	<83fui09i5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87fui03pjr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490550796 29901 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2017 17:53:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org
To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 26 19:53:10 2017
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1csCLh-0006nH-88
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:53:05 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41793 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1csCLn-0008C4-Bg
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:11 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33723)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLh-0008BO-E9
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:06 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLe-0002Ic-Cb
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:05 -0400
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47940)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1csCLe-0002IY-9O
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:02 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLe-0003mO-3h
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:02 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16828.B16828.149055073114465@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16828
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
Original-Received: via spool by 16828-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16828.149055073114465
	(code B ref 16828); Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:02 +0000
Original-Received: (at 16828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2017 17:52:11 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1csCKo-0003lF-LV
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:10 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42622)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csCKm-0003l3-QU
	for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:09 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csCKe-0001a5-Ap
	for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:03 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41744)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1csCKe-0001Zw-8O; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:00 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2957
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1csCKb-0006j7-Jg; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <87fui03pjr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net>
	(npostavs@users.sourceforge.net)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130982
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/130982>

> From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
> Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:39:52 -0400
> 
> > What about a special value of prefix argument, like zero?  If that's
> > OK, it's more convenient than any of the above.
> 
> Sure, it's just a matter of deciding how to fit this in with the
> existing interpretation of the prefix argument.  Right now, a non-nil
> prefix argument means to insert the result into the buffer.

Yes, I propose that the current behavior wrt the argument will be left
unchanged, except when the argument is zero, i.e. "C-u 0".