From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16828: 24.3.50; eval-expression, character representation of integer results time-consuming Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:51:42 +0300 Message-ID: <834lyg9b9t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <CABr8ebbLKP8As7ud-u3wmJ4cuua1NhKX8_yGpfSd7-1p1ez+bA@mail.gmail.com> <83mwhk4v48.fsf@gnu.org> <CABr8ebYbBF7AgHHsKWtyAi-c6BHvNpBis48+PgcfcZBH1Y-7OA@mail.gmail.com> <83txbr2sye.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjljf086.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83a9di3lt1.fsf@gnu.org> <877g8mb3lh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <b4my510yqdt.fsf@jpl.org> <530DBEEE.8060805@gmx.at> <87zig84s6l.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wpbc9ldc.fsf@gnu.org> <CAM-tV-_t2bjpE2byh3NvJjw8dfxTwk4rM7EjwSdTM13EgC=-wA@mail.gmail.com> <83lgrs9k8p.fsf@gnu.org> <87inmw3x5b.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83fui09i5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87fui03pjr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490550796 29901 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2017 17:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 26 19:53:10 2017 Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1csCLh-0006nH-88 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:53:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1csCLn-0008C4-Bg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLh-0008BO-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLe-0002Ic-Cb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLe-0002IY-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCLe-0003mO-3h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.16828.B16828.149055073114465@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16828 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 16828-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16828.149055073114465 (code B ref 16828); Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2017 17:52:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1csCKo-0003lF-LV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42622) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csCKm-0003l3-QU for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csCKe-0001a5-Ap for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csCKe-0001Zw-8O; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2957 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csCKb-0006j7-Jg; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:52:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <87fui03pjr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/> List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130982 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/130982> > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:39:52 -0400 > > > What about a special value of prefix argument, like zero? If that's > > OK, it's more convenient than any of the above. > > Sure, it's just a matter of deciding how to fit this in with the > existing interpretation of the prefix argument. Right now, a non-nil > prefix argument means to insert the result into the buffer. Yes, I propose that the current behavior wrt the argument will be left unchanged, except when the argument is zero, i.e. "C-u 0".