From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:28:30 +0300 Message-ID: <834ly0oew1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8A8DA980-13A7-4F8B-9D07-391728C673C9@raeburn.org> <831su4dmn4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9300x5n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <734D2132-71FD-414D-B091-629189742DB4@raeburn.org> <83a8889ede.fsf@gnu.org> <144D5F87-D876-485D-BAB3-2AA93627272A@raeburn.org> <83inmq53xk.fsf@gnu.org> <96D35768-314C-43F5-BD5E-B12187759DCA@raeburn.org> <123104DD-447F-4CDB-B3A0-CED80E3AC8C9@raeburn.org> <20170403165736.GA2851@acm> <2497A2D5-FDB1-47FF-AED3-FD4ABE2FE144@raeburn.org> <83lgrhpalq.fsf@gnu.org> <0D99B4FE-FEEF-4565-87D6-E230A05DEF3C@raeburn.org> <86lgrc4vob.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491550127 8510 195.159.176.226 (7 Apr 2017 07:28:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Brinkhoff , Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 07 09:28:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cwOJp-0000bl-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:28:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49370 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwOJv-0004Uv-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 03:28:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwOJp-0004Ue-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 03:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwOJl-0005NR-9r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 03:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwOJl-0005NN-6s; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 03:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4538 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cwOJk-0001xQ-FN; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 03:28:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <86lgrc4vob.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> (message from Lars Brinkhoff on Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:46:12 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213733 Archived-At: > From: Lars Brinkhoff > Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:46:12 +0200 > > Ken Raeburn wrote: > > I was aiming for a startup time under a tenth of a second, and didn’t > > get there, though there were a couple of additional things that could > > be tried, with some effort. I’m not sure a startup time of nearly a > > fifth of a second will feel for people. > > Every invokation of async-start launches a new emacs subprocess, doesn't > it? So startup time would also affect uses of async.el. Perhaps we could have a separate, much smaller dumped.elc for batch invocations, to cater to these use cases. Ken, does this make sense?