From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CSS contrast (#30295) (was Re: Heads-up: Emacs 26.1 RC1) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:54:49 +0200 Message-ID: <834ll9lv7a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83muz2lfo9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521618773 5244 195.159.176.226 (21 Mar 2018 07:52:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 07:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, johnw@gnu.org, tom@tromey.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 21 08:52:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyYY8-0001C5-BK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:52:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53343 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyYa9-0000gX-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:54:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyYa3-0000gM-S1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyYa3-0003p8-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyYZx-0003iA-0r; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1874 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eyYZw-0008NU-0t; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 03:54:36 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Yuri Khan on Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:52:15 +0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223878 Archived-At: > From: Yuri Khan > Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:52:15 +0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , John Wiegley , > Tom Tromey , Emacs Development > > Why not use the WCAG contrast ratio formula? > > https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#visual-audio-contrast > > (Except that, if implemented literally, it will probably not fit the > trivial change threshold.) I have nothing against implementing the WCAG contrast criterion, but that would certainly need to be done on master, not on the release branch. This discussion was about what to do for Emacs 26.1.