From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 19:58:09 +0300 Message-ID: <834lgat6fy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736wa9c5s.fsf@gmx.de> <87wotkn6do.fsf@gmx.de> <874lgn8x6l.fsf@gmx.de> <87sh44pisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7qbitc7.fsf@gmx.de> <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de> <83wotcpzub.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmaiuwml.fsf@gmx.de> <877el6uwio.fsf@gmx.de> <83bmaitbwu.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7q2w4gd.fsf@gmx.de> <838t5mt9wb.fsf@gnu.org> <87muu2w2c2.fsf@gmx.de> <83600qt8mi.fsf@gnu.org> <87in4qw1fl.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533401822 27243 195.159.176.226 (4 Aug 2018 16:57:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 16:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fgunbin@fastmail.fm, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 04 18:56:57 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flzrN-0006w6-44 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 18:56:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55687 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flztS-0002cE-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flzsj-0002by-9r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flzsg-0004UR-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flzsg-0004UN-41; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2819 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1flzsf-0002jO-FA; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:58:17 -0400 In-reply-to: <87in4qw1fl.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Sat, 04 Aug 2018 18:18:06 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228171 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, fgunbin@fastmail.fm, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 18:18:06 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> OK, But I also miss a better name for the `find-file-asynchronously' > >> user option. > > > > execute-command-asynchronously? > > Sounds too general to me, because it is about *file* visiting and saving. > > execute-file-command-asynchronously? But I _wanted_ it to be general, far beyond just file-related commands. I though that was what was being discussed: to have a convenient way of running a command, any command that supported it, asynchronously. Was I mistaken? In any case, why should there be a separate command to force just the file-related commands work asynchronously?