From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making 'eq' == 'eql' in bignum branch Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:59:50 +0300 Message-ID: <834lff6ejd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <09153aed-361d-4f82-d9ac-b502314769ae@cs.ucla.edu> <83lg91dqd4.fsf@gnu.org> <20180826201947.GC1867@ACM> <83in3w5yml.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535383141 9834 195.159.176.226 (27 Aug 2018 15:19:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 27 17:18:56 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJI7-0002My-Bp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:18:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33892 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJKD-0001TV-PF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuJDy-0001ud-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:14:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuIzt-0000J1-Jz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuIzr-0000FS-6g; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3506 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fuIzk-0002sY-HQ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:59:56 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:45:33 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228976 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:45:33 -0400 > > > I do. But such buffers are not larger than most-positive-fixnum, > > because I use a build --with-wide-int, where an Emacs integer is a > > 64-bit type. > > BTW, anyone interested in adding support for buffers larger than > most-positive-fixnum (using bignums) so that it can also be > done --without-wide-int? Wouldn't that be much slower than --with-wide-int? Instead of a couple of machine instructions we will have a function call.