From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: disk-usage Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: <834l8zimwg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imxgmacr.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <83r2c3iwha.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7irrbgc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <83ftsjitbd.fsf@gnu.org> <877edvr30g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="65982"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Pierre Neidhardt Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 19 20:45:06 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gwBKD-000H1W-Bv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:45:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwBKC-00023d-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwBJH-0001zY-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwBJH-0000Qo-9Y; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2204 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gwBJG-0005OU-MF; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:44:07 -0500 In-reply-to: <877edvr30g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (message from Pierre Neidhardt on Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:29:03 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233466 Archived-At: > From: Pierre Neidhardt > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:29:03 +0100 > > > Still, using directory-files-and-attributes etc. would be more > > portable than doing it with 'find' and 'du'. > > That's what I do, actually. I've provided two "listing" functions (customizable): > > - disk-usage--directory-size-with-emacs: use `directory-files-and-attributes' > recursively everywhere. This is portable but very slow. > > - disk-usage--directory-size-with-du: This uses `directory-files-and-attributes' > on the root folder to get the size of its direct subfiles, then `du -sb' on > the remaining subfolders. This is much faster. > > Makes sense? AFAICT, which one to use is left to the user, but I think it should be automatically deduced by the package, in particular depending on whether 'find' and 'du' are available.