From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34749: 26.1; `delete-windows-on': (1) doc, (2) bug, (3) bug, (4) candidates Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:58:37 +0200 Message-ID: <834l8d9orm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<>> <<<83o96lacf8.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<6aae54ec-85bf-4447-bec0-7c916caeb2f8@default>> <<83a7i59u85.fsf@gnu.org>> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="205968"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34749@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 20:00:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2KjC-000rPL-2S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 20:00:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2KjB-0002KI-2M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Kj1-0002Fr-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Kiz-0002Cn-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Kix-0002As-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Kix-0000yj-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:00:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 19:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34749 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34749-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34749.15520715423649 (code B ref 34749); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 19:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34749) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2019 18:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Khy-0000wc-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42546) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Khv-0000wG-PU for 34749@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Khq-000130-Er; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:58:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1950 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Kho-0002Vx-KD; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:58:53 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:14:32 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156159 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:14:32 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 34749@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I was saying that the doc string should also mention > > > that in this case any prefix arg you provide is ignored. > > > > But if the effect of the prefix arg is mapped into the non-interactive > > arguments, then there's nothing more to say, right? > > Sorry, I don't follow you. > > The doc says that if the window is dedicated and alone > in its frame then the frame is deleted (provided it is > not the only frame). > > And the doc (now) presumably describes prefix-arg behavior. > But a prefix arg is ignored when the window is dedicated > and alone etc. That info too needs to be provided, e.g. > in the doc describing prefix-arg behavior. What does prefix-arg have to do with this use case? AFAIU, the answer is "nothing", so there's nothing to be told, because the doc string changes I made just explain how the prefix argument maps into the FRAME argument.