From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36609: 27.0.50; Possible race-condition in threading implementation Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:34:29 +0300 Message-ID: <834l3r2jbe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87muhks3b5.fsf@hochschule-trier.de> <83muhj2zmb.fsf@gnu.org> <83ims72xcj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7dj2sz9.fsf@gnu.org> <835zo72jmr.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="255151"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36609@debbugs.gnu.org, politza@hochschule-trier.de To: pipcet@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 12 20:35:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0O4-0014E7-60 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:35:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0O3-0000ye-7g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0Nz-0000vN-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0Nx-0002qO-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0Nq-0002nH-NY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0Nq-0001VW-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36609.15629564875768 (code B ref 36609); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 18:34:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0Na-0001Uy-So for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:34:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0NY-0001Ul-QU for 36609@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0NR-0002SW-Ez; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3121 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hm0NQ-000894-Rn; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:34:37 -0400 In-reply-to: <835zo72jmr.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:27:40 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162798 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:27:40 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 36609@debbugs.gnu.org, politza@hochschule-trier.de > > Sorry, I don't want to call unwind-protect there. Call me paranoid, > if you want. Maybe I should explain the rationale behind that paranoia. The main reason is that you are proposing to do that inside code that can switch threads. Switching threads means switching to another stack and also to another set of handlers. So using the unwind-protect machinery in this situation is IMO asking for trouble. And then there's the TTY frame case, where C-g triggers SIGINT, and we actually longjmp from wherever we were...