From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31571: Regarding Emacs Learning Resources Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:55:47 +0300 Message-ID: <834l2mtouk.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="185410"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 31571@debbugs.gnu.org, vikas@hackr.io To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 12 16:57:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBky-000m6R-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:57:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46204 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBkx-0003qx-Ol for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBkt-0003qd-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBks-0000XV-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBks-0000XR-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBks-0001T5-31 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31571 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 31571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31571.15656217705580 (code B ref 31571); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2019 14:56:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBk1-0001Rw-Jo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBjz-0001Rh-L2 for 31571@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBju-0000EV-DM; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1942 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hxBjt-00075O-Jx; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:56:02 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Mon, 12 Aug 2019 04:00:34 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164916 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 04:00:34 +0200 > Cc: 31571@debbugs.gnu.org > > The only thing which really stands out as being absolutely worthy of > addition is emacsrocks.com. The other links had a lot of redundant > material (already mentioned in the guide), were paid resources, or > simply didn't look very professional or high quality. > > On the other hand emacsrocks.com is already mentioned on the front > page of the official Emacs web site, so it might be redundant. > > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ > > All of this is completely subjective, of course. But I suggest to add > the emacsrocks.com web site and close this. Not sure I understand: where do you suggest to add a reference to emacsrocks, given that it's already mentioned on the Emacs Web site?