From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37142: Confusing message in FAQ: "This version has been heavily edited" Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:34:19 +0300 Message-ID: <834l29clqs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h869cofm.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="179605"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37142@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 22 16:36:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oCl-000kb7-Sx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:36:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43940 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oCk-0001RL-O2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oB5-00083r-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oB4-0006h7-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oB4-0006ge-Ai for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oB4-0002Fq-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37142 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37142-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37142.15664844588609 (code B ref 37142); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37142) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2019 14:34:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38078 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oAM-0002En-7E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50773) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oAK-0002Ea-KV for 37142@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oAF-0006Aj-49; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2932 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i0oAE-0005vH-HX; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:34:10 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:10:05 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165585 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:10:05 +0200 > Cc: 37142@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > [This version has been heavily edited since it was > > > > included in the Emacs distribution.] > > > > > > I'm not sure how to interpret that. Does that line make sense in a > > > released version? > > > > So as not to imply that the people mentioned in the Copyright lines > > above that are solely responsible for the contents, I presume. > > Ah, now I understand. Maybe I'm unusually slow, but could we please > clarify that by adding "in the year 2000" after "included in the Emacs > distribution"? Sure, why not?