From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Let mode-line packages distinguish the selected-window Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:10:26 +0200 Message-ID: <834kzqp631.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87blu3pqyc.fsf@bernoul.li> <83wocrtxl3.fsf@gnu.org> <9a34b0c1-149b-a850-db88-b9d7cb5c751e@gmx.at> <87tv7triwh.fsf@bernoul.li> <43be954b-fc69-166f-eb51-fcf2c93c6ee1@gmx.at> <87r22xw46f.fsf@bernoul.li> <9630e62d-d2fe-6069-0b81-dc9ce956d6bf@gmx.at> <83r22vpwnj.fsf@gnu.org> <98c253fe-7ad2-9c79-e1a1-1141ee17730c@gmx.at> <83d0efpexp.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="30254"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 17:10:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqYR-0007cv-LR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:10:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42334 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqYQ-0004Qa-C7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqYI-0004OD-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqYH-0007MV-BS; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3782 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqYG-0005BP-OO; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:10:29 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:14:13 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241631 Archived-At: > Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:14:13 +0100 > > > Good for you, but I wrote what I wrote because I don't see it here. > > Then try the following: With emacs -Q do C-x 5 2 followed by C-h f and > via Alt-TAB switch back to the first frame. Here both frames get the > active mode-line face. > > Now in the first frame do C-h f, do a mouse click in the second frame > and via Alt-TAB switch back to the first frame. Here both frames get > the inactive mode-line face. The latter part I don't see: I get only one inactive frame. As for the former, I'm not sure it's a bug. It certainly doesn't look like uninitialized variable to me: too consistent. Anyway, this is a tangent, and we don't have to argue about it.