From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:17:53 +0300 Message-ID: <834ktuqz5a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9mdssqx.fsf@gnu.org> <679ab47b-6e3e-65e6-f955-be58d59ed092@yandex.ru> <83sghhss8v.fsf@gnu.org> <671b5b41-663d-5ab9-f022-dc6c5ce54dd0@yandex.ru> <83r1x1sqkx.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfn9s63n.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7xvqsgc.fsf@gnu.org> <90749329-ccb1-f96e-29c0-b4ecbb81d1d4@yandex.ru> <837dyrqews.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="2265"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 08 08:18:42 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jM42s-0000Tl-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 08:18:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56480 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jM42r-0001Ly-F9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:18:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jM42D-0000wT-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jM42D-0005s5-IP; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2960 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jM426-0003Nz-1O; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:17:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 7 Apr 2020 23:05:04 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246638 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 23:05:04 +0300 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I can and can't reproduce this at the same time. > > Meaning, I do see "fontification of the next line to its original face" > take some time. But if I don't wait for it to turn black again and > continue typing, nothing bad happens: Emacs continues reacting to input > just as promptly, and the next line turns black soon enough. Whether this is "bad" depends on what you use the fontification for. For me, it's a sign of syntax correctness (among other things), so waiting for the confirmation of the syntax for such a relatively long time is quite "bad".