From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 05:23:17 +0300 Message-ID: <834kslao2y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com> <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83blmu9u57.fsf@gnu.org> <7c61a272-f4ba-fdfd-755b-1a720e8cc2df@gmail.com> <838shy9srs.fsf@gnu.org> <7f820b59-ebbc-18c7-9f08-104a7ba88dd2@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="2558"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ndame@protonmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 12 04:24:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYKac-0000XP-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 04:24:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYKab-0001KD-Bx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 22:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYKa7-0000vC-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 22:23:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYKa5-0003IC-Kj; Mon, 11 May 2020 22:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1922 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jYKZx-0004Ag-9g; Mon, 11 May 2020 22:23:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7f820b59-ebbc-18c7-9f08-104a7ba88dd2@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Mon, 11 May 2020 15:36:31 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249912 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, > casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > ndame@protonmail.com > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:36:31 -0400 > > No, my situation is that I have someone sending me a pull request or a patch by email. I can ask this person if they have an assignment, but I can't check whether they in fact do. Then you describing a situation different from the one that started this. This thread is about copyright assignments for GNU ELPA, where we discuss packages that already exist on some site that we consider for adding to ELPA. > > We are talking about the situation where all > > you have is a commit made by someone in a Git repository other than > > that of Emacs. > > I don't understand this part. If there is no signature on that commit, how does it relate to the scheme I was proposing? It relates to the subject of this thread, whereas you are talking about something very different.