From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41321: 27.0.91; Emacs aborts due to invalid pseudovector objects Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:14:22 +0300 Message-ID: <834ks4vygh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zha8cgpi.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1vibmyj.fsf@gnu.org> <83imgublku.fsf@gnu.org> <831rncjuwf.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7w5xvfa.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2phwb9x.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1v9w9vi.fsf@gnu.org> <83mu5xw50d.fsf@gnu.org> <83k110wxte.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="35566"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41321@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 25 17:15:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEp4-00098e-2t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 17:15:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEp3-0007HN-0v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEoh-0007C4-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEog-0000Jp-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEog-00071U-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41321.159041965926928 (code B ref 41321); Mon, 25 May 2020 15:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2020 15:14:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEnz-00070G-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEnx-000703-Lh for 41321@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEns-0008Gk-AM; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4483 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jdEnr-0006J1-Iw; Mon, 25 May 2020 11:14:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Mon, 25 May 2020 06:40:11 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180979 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 06:40:11 +0000 > Cc: 41321@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier > > What are you actually planning to do? Given the fact that I'm the only one who sees these problems? Not much: I intend to continue running Emacs under GDB and collect data about the crashes until either I figure out what causes the crashes, or the crashes disappear (which would mean the problem was fixed indirectly by some other change). > I think we should work around the mingw bug on both the master and > emacs-27 branches. That depends on what the proposed solution or workaround will be. We need to see where the discussion of the alignment issue goes and what we decide to do about that. > What we should not do is encourage people to keep looking for another > Emacs bug based on the existing backtraces. Indeed, I'm posting the backtraces for the record; no one should feel compelled to study them unless they are interested.