From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43463: 27.1; Elisp manual error, printed text in Interaction buffer Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:40:04 +0300 Message-ID: <834knw7c97.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8d15246b145ad2b7aa616aedd7b28c4d6b40f1d4.camel@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20272"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43463@debbugs.gnu.org To: dalanicolai@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 17 15:42:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIuBS-0005BU-44 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:42:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37826 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIuBR-0007ws-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu9m-0006fG-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu9m-0006OH-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu9m-0005H0-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43463 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43463-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43463.160035000320184 (code B ref 43463); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43463) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2020 13:40:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37576 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu8o-0005FT-BO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu8m-0005Ev-CG for 43463@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu8g-00064y-MN; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:39:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3542 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kIu8g-0007GN-17; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:39:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8d15246b145ad2b7aa616aedd7b28c4d6b40f1d4.camel@gmail.com> (dalanicolai@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188196 Archived-At: > From: dalanicolai@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:19:59 +0200 > > In section 1.3.4 of the Elisp manual (version 27.1), it says that > printed text from evaluated code in an Interactive buffer (e.g. > *scratch*) is inserted into that buffer, but this is not true when I > evaluate such code in a non-customized vanilla Emacs. Could you please describe in more detail how you evaluate such code in a way that produces results which contradict what the manual says? Because I don't think I understand what you mean by that. Thanks.