From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43645: 26.3; emacsclient -c does not open to correct window Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:09:41 +0300 Message-ID: <834knjnquy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tuvjo82b.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5byzr9.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31946"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bluetrack121@gmail.com, 43645@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 27 18:11:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZGx-0008ER-BD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:11:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54942 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZGw-0003Rv-DX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZGQ-0003R2-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZGQ-0001Jo-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZGQ-0005pk-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43645 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43645-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43645.160122300322346 (code B ref 43645); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2020 16:10:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZFT-0005oL-5J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZFR-0005nn-RD for 43645@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZFM-00012m-Jx; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1919 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZFL-00083k-PB; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:09:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zh5byzr9.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:02:02 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189146 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 43645@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:02:02 +0200 > > I'm now sure what you mean by "the first emacsclient instance is on top > also"? My guess is that the frame created by the first emacsclient invocation is on top (in the z-order) of that created by the second invocation. That's probably a WM thing, though. > When I do this, I get a new Emacs frame with the *scratch* buffer > displayed Does this happen even if the second invocation of emacsclient uses a different file name, not the same test.txt as the first one?