From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggest installing more fonts? Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:55:56 +0300 Message-ID: <834kmrshvn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnzqa1be.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh4lthv4.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6wlt5ie.fsf@gnu.org> <837drpt1tb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnzostl0.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn5gklev.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5289"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 18 16:56:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUA73-0001CO-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 16:56:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45474 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUA72-0006zN-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:56:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUA6E-0006YV-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUA6D-0005Ck-G4; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1419 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUA6C-0007xA-7h; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:55:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pn5gklev.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:06:48 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258030 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Gregory Heytings , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 10:06:48 +0200 > > >> if (!ft_face) > >> { > >> unblock_input (); > >> /* further cleanup? */ > >> return Qnil; > >> } > > > > We had already such a patch submitted, but not installed for some > > reason I cannot understand, and it was just recently mentioned on > > bug-gnu-emacs (together with a few more places where such a test is > > needed). > > I seem to recall that the reason was that the patch doesn't cover the > other places where the test is needed? The other places were identified in the discussion, and are quite easy to find by looking at the code. I'd write the code myself, but I have no access to a system where I can run the result, so I prefer that someone else does that.