From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5803: 23.1.94; Using tq-enqueue in timer messes with keystroke echoing Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:20:19 +0200 Message-ID: <834kkt4j6k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k4sulox8.fsf@engster.org> <87h7owch10.fsf@gnus.org> <834kku6f0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7oux1l8.fsf@gnus.org> <83czzh4qio.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16661"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 5803@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 19:21:54 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knQZc-00048x-9R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:21:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33338 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQZb-0000eV-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYp-0000cM-Vw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYo-0005x7-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYo-0003Mk-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5803 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 5803-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5803.160762445712906 (code B ref 5803); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2020 18:20:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYi-0003M5-VC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:20:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYh-0003Ls-3M for 5803@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:20:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYZ-0005tm-FR; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2011 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1knQYQ-0003kD-HM; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:20:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:29:00 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195680 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 5803@debbugs.gnu.org, > deng@randomsample.de > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:29:00 -0500 > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-09/msg00914.html > > > > but AFAIR never did... > > Yes, I'm still using this patch in my daily Emacs. > And no I haven't noticed any effect. Of course, that's far from > a guarantee that there are no such adverse effects (while I'm > undoubtedly the most important person in my world, I don't think that's > enough to make a statistically significant sample; and on top of that, > I might very well not have noticed some of the effects). Then perhaps we should install that change and see what breaks?