From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:56:32 +0200 Message-ID: <834kh39fvj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <87tup3hwat.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14245"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stephan.Mueller@microsoft.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 19:57:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOPju-0003Yw-LC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:57:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOPjt-0004S5-Nl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOPj7-0003on-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOPj6-0003TR-DX; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:56:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4394 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lOPj1-0002x8-1F; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:56:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tup3hwat.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:34:34 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266789 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:34:34 +0100 > Cc: Gregory Heytings , > "emacs-devel@gnu.org" > > Stephan Mueller writes: > > > I use C-o (usually followed by C-n) many times a day, instead of > > , in order to suppress re-indentation of the current line in > > cases where that re-indentation will be incorrect for my purposes**. > > Oh, I see -- it's useful as an alternative to `RET' exactly when > re-indentation does the wrong thing? Yes, but not only that -- it doesn't move point to the next line, unlike RET.