From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2ed2999: Improve documentation of new Xref options Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:18:36 +0300 Message-ID: <834kawpder.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210905075953.20536.20920@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210905075955.0F6B720A0A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <6f1fcbee-1825-1219-88fb-e6f28d00ab4d@yandex.ru> <831r62tjf3.fsf@gnu.org> <0eaa7dc7-a3f2-5319-bf09-629f9949e416@yandex.ru> <834kaxsxb8.fsf@gnu.org> <7fe2eafb-e15a-beab-f485-9c80b2913121@yandex.ru> <831r61soqu.fsf@gnu.org> <6c33d3c8-5155-f0fe-ec47-0630d9f3525f@yandex.ru> <83h7ewpmc4.fsf@gnu.org> <6b688b48-eae7-1dbc-3de6-97f071583659@yandex.ru> <838s08peuk.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4393"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 07 18:19:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdoK-0000wJ-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 18:19:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45292 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdoJ-00060i-Mz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdnn-0005Ez-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:18:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdnm-0003yP-Q1; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2218 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNdnm-0008Ae-DS; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:18:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:01:46 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274262 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:01:46 +0300 > > On 07.09.2021 18:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> Should we perhaps treat dired-do-find-regexp like we do with > >>> dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace, to avoid confusion due to > >>> inconsistency? > >> dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace is a totally different command, which > >> could use an entirely different UI (as soon as someone wrote one). > >> > >> There is no way to have it obey xref-auto-jump-to-first-xref: it simply > >> failed to work without the fix. > > I understand. But wouldn't it confuse users that dired-do-find-regexp > > obeys the option, while dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace does not? I > > though perhaps we should make both not obey. > > Having dired-do-find-regexp and project-find-regexp behave differently > should be more confusing. I only meant the former, because it is a Dired command, like dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace. I was thinking about Dired users.